“So what”, you might think when you have never had a problem before? If you have been aware that a lender is most concerned to know that you have:
- Enough income, and
- Enough deposit or equity then you should have no problem getting loan approval. Right?
Well, that used to be fine for most of us, but things have changed. A lot!
You will have heard about the Royal Commission into the banks – hard to miss it with there being so much coverage of the proceedings. The banks have been shown to be quite irresponsible and unethical in so many of their dealings with their customers.
Just to point out how much has changed, in the last year one particular statistic tells an eye-opening story.
Did you know that a year ago about 5% of loan applications were rejected by lenders. Today about 40% of loan applications are rejected!
That means that it is not just a matter of fewer people being interested in getting loans, it is even more importantly a case of so many people not being able to get loans at all.
Why? What changed?
The RC made it very clear that lenders have been way too easy to be convinced that people could afford to borrow. The area they concentrated on was “Household Expenses”. In other words how much those prospective borrowers were spending and on what.
Previously there had been a weak standard that was all too often automatically applied to incomes to guess at what was being spent. It was known as “HEM”. Even the banks were well aware that this measure was unrealistic!
In fact, many lenders had asked on applications for estimations of expenses, which usually amounted to appreciably higher spending than the “HEM” figure. That was then considered to be enough information to assess the borrowing capacity.
No evidence was looked at in the vast majority of applications.
In truth, if such evidence was looked at it was revealed that many of the applicants were spending money like water on all sorts of wasteful things, even regular gambling!
Have a look at your own statements for your banking and credit cards. Do you see items that you could have not spent your money on? If you were a lender and you saw that money was being handled in a rather casual way would you think twice about lending to that person?
If your records only show already quite responsible patterns of money management you can expect a lender to welcome an application from you. Congratulations, you are in the better half of Aussies!
What if your details are unsatisfactory?
Another aspect was the criticism by the RC of the use of interest-only loans, which would have needed lesser payments than principal and interest, so buyers need to be able to handle these higher payments.
Warning! All of this advice is general in nature and is not sufficient for you to base any decision-making on. You must discuss all relevant matters with suitably experienced and qualified people (not just looking online!).